🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.